Anthropic announced the deprecation of Claude Sonnet 4.5 on September 30. The model name claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929 is now marked deprecated, and the retirement date on the Claude API is November 30, 2026. Recommended replacement: claude-sonnet-5-5.
What that means in practice
The numbers live in the deprecations table in the platform docs, and the order there never changes: announcement, then two months, then gone. Opus 4.1 was deprecated on June 5 and retired on August 5. Sonnet 4 and Opus 4 went on the list April 14 and left June 15. For Sonnet 4.5 it’s 61 days.
The date inside the model name tells you how long it served: 20250929. One year and two days.
If you pinned the dated model ID in your code — which is what Anthropic recommends for production systems, you get errors instead of answers from November 30. An alias like claude-sonnet-latest only moves the work forward: the model then changes without you asking, and Sonnet 5.5 just showed how much that can matter: five breaking changes against Sonnet 5, including tool_choice with types any and tool, which now answers with HTTP 400.
Who’s next in line
Worth reading the rest of that table before you migrate:
claude-opus-4-5-20251101is active, retirement not before November 24, 2026. That’s the next date that can hurt.claude-haiku-4-5-20251001is active, not before October 15, 2026.claude-sonnet-4-6is active, not before February 17, 2027.claude-sonnet-5is active, not before June 30, 2027.claude-sonnet-5-5is active, not before September 28, 2027.
So the full year of runway is back on the new model.
A year is the cadence, not the exception
The pattern is clear enough to plan around now: a model runs roughly a year in full service, then gets two months of notice, then disappears. That the date sometimes arrives less predictably than that doesn’t improve the arithmetic.
My advice: treat November 30 as a testing deadline, not a migration deadline. Two months is plenty of time to work through Sonnet 5.5’s five breaking changes. But only if you don’t start on November 25.
Sources: